SMOOSH JUICE
The Telepone Game & Felltower
Last game session, we got to enjoy the telephone game – I mentioned this Friday, but it’s worth repeating here.
“The telephone game is alive and well. One of my players suggested getting some arrows of dragon slaying, because Puissance +3 is cheap on arrows and any weapon with Puissance +3 is Slaying. So, almost none of that is actually true. But half-remembered rules and events get passed along and become, to paraphrase Phillip J. Fry, widely-believed facts.
You have to wonder how many things in Felltower are regarded differently than they actually are thanks to similar half-remembered details passed along, morphed, and then re-remembered. I’m half curious but mostly I deliberately tune out the player discussions to avoid giving away what I actually think.
“
It got me thinking about Felltower and the “played out” nature of it. It’s been voiced repeatedly by my players, old and new, that Felltower really has no more easy areas and only near-certain death areas. You need to be X points to survive what’s ahead, no one is X points, and getting those points requires new exploration or loot and that’s all played out in the survivable areas. How true is that?
There are a good number of “unsolvable” encounters, auto-death locations, places that need special abilities to usefully interact with, and so on. But are they always what they seem?
There are a few places that newer players – and some vets alike – would like to go and deal with. But they’re shot down when suggested because they are rejected by a sufficient number of players (a plurality, in general, of nos vs. a minority each of yesses and agnostic.) I think some of them are a variation of the telephone game. You get player memories of events their previous PC enountered, accounts written down by me after the game session, and what people remember being told second hand. It creates a stew of uncertainty.* My players are, to a degree, willing to risk their PCs in a fight, but only if they know it is winnable and has a reward. But what gets defined as “winnable” is colored heavily by the telephone game.
More than once I’ve heard people bring up an idea, and have it shot down for reasons I know are, at best, oversold. This can be a big downside to a megadungeon or any other repeat-play area. Because you can find out things now to make tasks easier later, there is a reluctance to take a jump into the unknown, and a strong reluctance to try where group memory says something is hard.
I am not really sure what a solution is for this problem. It remains one of the big issues of Felltower right now – people have combed over the “easy” stuff again and again and again, and take a shot at the risky stuff only when there is no choice. Or not even then. Sometimes they’re right to do so . . . but other times, it’s just a case of misinformation becoming common sense. How to resolve this? I don’t actually know.
* I need to stat up Stew of Uncertainty at some point. Maybe next April 1st.